Wilson Combat CQB Commander Compact vs Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 4"
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQB Commander Compact | 7.85 in | 4.9 in | 1.3 in | 36.5 oz |
| M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 4" | 7.25 in | 5 in | 1.3 in | 29 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CQB Commander Compact | 4.25 in | SAO | wilsoncombat.com |
| M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 4" | 4 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 45 ACP | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| CQB Commander Compact | 7 (+1) | - |
| M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 4" | - | 15 (+1) |
Notes
Wilson Combat CQB Commander Compact
Also chambered in 9mm. Capacities unknown.
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 Metal Compact 4" For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
