Ruger EC9s vs Smith & Wesson M&P M2.0 Compact 4.6" Spec
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC9s | 6 in | 4.95 in | 0.9 in | 17.2 oz |
| M&P M2.0 Compact 4.6" Spec | 8 in | 5.6 in | 1.2 in | 28.5 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EC9s | 3.12 in | Striker-Fired | ruger.com |
| M&P M2.0 Compact 4.6" Spec | 4.6 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| EC9s | 7 (+1) | 7 (+1) |
| M&P M2.0 Compact 4.6" Spec | 15 , 23 (+1) | 15 , 23 (+1) |
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Ruger EC9s For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
