Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact vs Wilson Combat EDC X9S
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| EDC X9S | 6.75 in | 4.5 in | 1.25 in | 25.2 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| EDC X9S | 3.25 in | SAO | wilsoncombat.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 17 (+1) |
| EDC X9S | 10 (+1) | 10 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
Wilson Combat EDC X9S For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
