Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact vs Smith & Wesson Model 642
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| Model 642 | 6.3 in | 4.2 in | 1.3 in | 14.4 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| Model 642 | 1.87 in | DAO | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 38 Special +P | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | - |
| Model 642 | - | 5 |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
Smith & Wesson Model 642 For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
