Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact vs Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact
vs
Dimensions
| Length L | Height H | Width W | Weight W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 6.49 in | 4.6 in | 1.09 in | 22 oz |
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | 6.6 in | 4.98 in | 1.3 in | 25 oz |
Details
| Barrel BBL | Trigger | Website | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 3.5 in | Striker-Fired | diamondbackfirearms.com |
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | 3.6 in | Striker-Fired | smith-wesson.com |
Capacity
| 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger | |
|---|---|---|
| DBAM29 Sub-compact | 12 , 17 (+1) | 12 , 17 (+1) |
| M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact | 12 , 10 (+1) | 12 , 10 (+1) |
Notes
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact
5.6" height with extended magazine
Side-by-Side
Side-by-Side Comparison Charts
How do these two handguns stack up against eachother?
Diamondback DBAM29 Sub-compact For Sale
Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact For Sale
Tabletop
Tabletop Comparison
Drag/drop and reorder the handguns to compare on top of eachother
